4 posts tagged with "legal"

This is in response to a recent X user’s post inquiring into the relationship between Pawprint Press and an individual who used to offer sales of PPP products in China who is now associated with TPM.

We believe it is necessary to issue a detailed response and share it publicly for two reasons:

• Because the phrasing of the comment in Chinese was vague and rather open into interpretations.

• Explaining in detail helps to avoid any context being lost in translation— particularly for our Chinese-speaking friends.

It came to our attention that TPM posted a design diagram of Pink Panda on their website, claiming they were “open-sourcing” the design “to foster progress within the industry” (honestly, we have no idea what that means).

We allege that this company appropriated our designs, materials, and contractors to produce their own products. This allegation is supported by contemporaneous records and third-party confirmations.

Incidents outlined here took place over the course of many months. While we could have commented on them sooner— we felt it best to remain silent. This avoided fanning drama, let us assess the situation, and prepare for proper legal action under China’s strict evidentiary rules governing admissible evidence.

Some interpreted our silence on these matters as condoning TPM’s conduct. We hope this statement clarifies our position.

Since July, we’ve been preparing for litigation. During that time TPM has further infringed the exclusive copyright and trademark rights held by us and our licensor. We are bringing a separate action regarding these infringements, which we also address in this statement.

Dear customers,

We’re aware that some listings online have been selling counterfeit or otherwise bootleg copies of our products and designs, such as the Amicus Plush.